Friday, April 30, 2010

debt, slavery, and the historical emergence of a market for money

3 Quarks Daily recently posted this very interesting article on the historical connection between debt, slavery, the market, along with so many other interesting details dating back to the very first societies. A great introduction to this topic. Here's one of several excellent excerpts:
First of all, as we all know, it is another typical – perhaps defining – feature of slavery that slaves can be bought or sold. In this case, absolute debt becomes (in another context, that of the market) no longer absolute. In fact, it can be precisely quantified. There is good reason to believe that it was just this operation that made it possible to create something like our contemporary form of money to begin with, since what anthropologists used to refer to as "primitive money", the kind that one finds in stateless societies (Solomon Island feather money, Iroquois wampum), was mostly used to arrange marriages, resolve blood feuds, and fiddle with other sorts of relations between people, rather than to buy and sell commodities. For instance, if slavery is debt, then debt can lead to slavery. A Babylonian peasant might have paid a handy sum in silver to his wife's parents to officialise the marriage, but he in no sense owned her. He certainly couldn't buy or sell the mother of his children. But all that would change if he took out a loan. Were he to default, his creditors could first remove his sheep and furniture, then his house, fields and orchards, and finally take his wife, children, and even himself as debt peons until the matter was settled (which, as his resources vanished, of course became increasingly difficult to do). Debt was the hinge that made it possible to imagine money in anything like the modern sense, and therefore, also, to produce what we like to call the market: an arena where anything can be bought and sold, because all objects are (like slaves) disembedded from their former social relations and exist only in relation to money.
Full article is from Eurozine; it can be found here

Enjoy!

1 comment:

  1. Taking nothing away from the horrible concept of another person as legal property...
    If your only freedom is to choose to sell our labor power or die, we are legally "free" but is this a system of freedom?

    ReplyDelete